Talk:Interpreter

From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any...)
 
m (Reverted edits by Ebybymic (Talk); changed back to last version by Matthew Harward)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any ideas? -- [[User:JaninaVoigt|Janina Voigt]]
 
I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any ideas? -- [[User:JaninaVoigt|Janina Voigt]]
 +
 +
:Agreed. It is very specific, maybe this was one of the areas they thought patterns applied most to and thus decided to add it. --[[User:AlexGee|AlexGee]]
 +
 +
:I agree, though having said that, the GoF never claimed all of there patterns were applicable across domains (horizontal). And interpreter could be used for parsing stuff in a whole heap of domains... --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 04:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:08, 25 November 2010

I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any ideas? -- Janina Voigt

Agreed. It is very specific, maybe this was one of the areas they thought patterns applied most to and thus decided to add it. --AlexGee
I agree, though having said that, the GoF never claimed all of there patterns were applicable across domains (horizontal). And interpreter could be used for parsing stuff in a whole heap of domains... --Matthew Harward 04:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools