Talk:OO wisdom

From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Ebybymic (Talk); changed back to last version by Matthew Harward)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
:I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:22, 25 November 2010

I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- User:Michal Connole

I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --Matthew Harward 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under OO culture as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --Michal Connole 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --Matthew Harward 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools